Navigate

Results/Testimonials

Results - DUI Attorney, Nathan L. Webb

Accomplishments*

Although I always strive for an outright dismissal of the charges, these are just some examples of the substantial reductions (plea bargains) and jury trial results I have been able to accomplish with clients who have been arrested for DUI or other criminal charges*:

• Not Guilty Verdict! Jury trial: DUI charge wherein the Trooper alleged my client was extremely intoxicated, did extremely poorly on field sobriety tests and almost fell down as he exited his vehicle. The trooper alleged my client performed so poorly on the field sobriety tests they were stopped because he couldn't keep his balance. The trooper alleged my client thought (when asked what the current time was at the station) it was 1 a.m. when in fact it was 4 a.m. Snohomish County District Court - Case No. C00717832. November 2008.
• Dismissed! DUI charge (second offense within seven years). Client was involved in accident which resulted in serious injuries to himself and his passenger. Officers on the scene alleged they smelled the odor of alcohol and observed my client to have slurred speech, a flushed face, bloodshot watery eyes and unsteady balance. Client transported to hospital for a blood draw which alleged an amount of alcohol over the legal limit. Court concluded there was no probable cause to have arrested my client after an evidentiary hearing. Seattle Municipal Court - Case No. 512346. November 2008.
• Dismissed!. DUI charge. Client alleged to have swerved on roadway several times. Officer noted odor of alcohol, fast speech, bloodshot watery eyes and flushed face. Officer alleged client did poorly on field sobriety tests and client submitted to a breath test at the station. Kitsap County District Court - Case No. 18773101. November 2008.
• Not Guilty Verdict! Jury trial: DUI charge (second offense within seven years). Trooper alleged client swerved violently on I-5 southbound in Tacoma. Trooper alleged client to have slurred speech, unsteady balance and to have fallen down at the station. Client was alleged to have failed all the field sobriety tests and refused the breath test at the station. Entire incident was on trooper's dashboard video camera. Pierce County District Court - Case No. 8YC001929. October 2008.
• Dismissed! DUI charge (second offense within seven years). Client alleged to have failed to signal when entering roadway. Officer alleged client swerved into oncoming traffic and did not stop when emergency lights and siren activated. Client performed all field tests (which the officer claims client failed miserably) and gave two BAC results over the legal limit. Renton Municipal Court - Case No. CR0046905. September 2008.
• Dismissed! DUI and Reckless Driving charges. Client alleged to have high-centered his vehicle after almost hitting another vehicle in the opposite direction. Two witnesses called 911 to report and three officers responded. Client was administered field tests, a DRE evaluation, and blood test results confirmed the presence of illegal narcotics. Dismissal of DUI and Reckless Driving amended to the civil infraction of Negligent Driving 2nd degree. Issaquah Municipal Court - Case No. C0008785 ISP. February 2008.
• Not Guilty Verdict!. Jury Trial: Reckless Driving and Reckless Endangerment. Client was charged with cutting off another driving, almost clipping the front end and exceeding highway speeds for 17 miles resulting in a rear end collision. Client had two passengers in vehicle at the time of allegation. Lower Kittitas County District Court - Case No. CC2007053. January 2008.
• Dismissed! DUI charge where client refused field sobriety tests, was arrested and submitted to a breath test. Court concluded there was a lack of probable cause to arrest after evidentiary hearing. Seattle District Court - Case No. C00662478. August 2007.
• Not Guilty Verdict! Jury Trial: DUI Refusal and Resisting Arrest. Client is alleged to have stopped his vehicle in a local fast food restaurant drive thru, yell at the patrons and employees, run from police when contacted, wrestle with the arresting officers and after arrest spat at and kick the patrol vehicle's windows. Auburn Municipal Court Case Nos. C90359 and C90360. May 2007.
• Dismissed! DUI Refusal - defendant alleged to have swerved and weaved while driving 40 MPH on I-5, Trooper alleged defendant failed all FSTs, refused BAC test and threw up twice in holding cell: result - After evidentiary hearing the case was dismissed for lack of reasonable suspicion to stop driver. KCDC Case No. C00585479. February 2007.
• Dismissed! Reckless Endangerment - man accused of firing .32 and .45 caliber handguns at security guard, allegation covered in local press. Puyallup Municipal Court case no. C0053747. August 2006.
• Dismissed! Negligent Driving First Degree - client took field tests and submitted to breath test. Puyallup Municipal Court case no. C0057748. August 2007.
• Dismissed! Obstruction - failing to cooperate during DV investigation. Lynnwood Municipal Court Case No. C0040065. February 2007.
• DUI - client pulled over in HOV lane, refused breath test:result -Bail Forfeiture (fine only - no criminal implications)
• DOL Hearing - client charged with second DUI within 3 years, BAC of .132 and .121 - result: dismissal (no license suspension).
• DUI - client pulled over for weaving, performed all FSTs, BAC taken: result - Bail Forfeiture (fine only - no criminal implications)
• DUI - client stopped for driving down wrong way exit onto I-5 w/BAC of .126 and .128: result - Negligent Driving 1st degree: no sr-22 insurance, no ignition interlock, no DUI conditions.
• MIP - representation of four individuals in car charged with exhibiting the effects of having consumed alcohol while under the age of 21 after driver was arrested for DUI: result - dismissal of charges.
• DUI - jury trial where client charged with DUI and Possession of Marijuana: result - deferred sentence after verdict (dismissal of charges after conditions met)
• Not Guilty Verdict! DUI - jury trial where client was involved in head-on collision, had marijuana in system - charged with DUI and Negligent Driving 1st degree (co-counsel). Seattle Municipal Court. May 2006.
• DUI - client charged with second DUI in three years, BAC result of .15: result - Reduction of charges (no DUI) no jail, no alcohol evaluation, 12 mos. unmonitored probation, no DUI conviction.
• DUI - client pulled over for weaving and driving 80+ mph, performed FSTs, BAC of .13: result - Negligent Driving 1st degree (deferred sentence-charges subsequently dismissed)
• Assault - second assault charge in two years: result - deferred sentence dismissal
• DUI, MIP, Fake ID - minor client charged with 2nd DUI in three years, MIP, Fake ID, Minor in Consumption: result - reduction of DUI to negligent driving 1st degree (no jail), probation only on MIP; Fake ID and MIC charges dropped.
• DOL Hearing - client charged with DUI (alleged to have almost hit police car) and BAC of .18: result - dismissal.
• DOL Hearing - client charged with second DUI in two years: result - dismissal, no suspension of license.
• DOL Hearing - client with BAC of .14: result - dismissal.
• DOL Hearing - client with BAC of .185 and .181: result - dismissal.

Testimonials

Mr. Webb was excellent! His court presence was phenomenal. It was easy to see that I had by far the best lawyer in the court room. He kept me informed of all the possibilities and gave me the information I needed to make decisions during the entire process. I will have no problem referring others to Nathan Webb. He was great. The case was dismissed. Thanks Nathan!

- Michael M.

I was charged with a DUI and resisting arrest on a routine traffic stop that arose from a traffic stop. After being pulled over, I exited my vehicle upon the officers request and made a phone call which resulted in me being tackled from behind. My chances looked very grim. Nathan informed me that taking a plea bargain would not be a bad choice, but after witnessing his presence in court I decided to pursue trial. Both sides presented their case well, but with charisma, compelling arguments, and additional information found and presented by Nathan my case was dismissed. I would recommend him to anyone looking for a well spoken attorney, regardless of the cases circumstance.

- Brian S.

I recently had occasion to hire Mr. Webb to defend me in a case involving a neglient driving first degree criminal infraction. Mr. Webb came highly recommended. During my first interview with Mr. Webb I knew I had made the right choice. He was very knowlegable about the case law relevant to this matter, and demonstrated excellent command of proper police and administrative procedures. Mr. Webb presented a highly professional demeanor in court and interacted well with the prosecuting attorney and judge alike. His arguments were well conceived, articulated with conviction and were persuasive. Thanks to Mr. Webb my case was dismissed. I would recommend Mr. Webb to others as highly as he was recommended to me and will call on him again if ever the need arises.

- Steven S.

Nathan,
I can't thank you enough for all that you have done for Robert and I, including going out of your way to help us through this difficult situation. You have helped to ensure that Robert and his wife Trish will have a better future and that he will have a better chance for advancement at his job. Thanks for your professionalism, kindness and for providing direction through the legal maze. I also appreciate the discounted rate.

It has been nice knowing you and I wish you, your wife and new daughter all the love and happiness in your new home.
- Gary G.

Nate,
Thanks! I am so relieved with the outcome of my case. I have full faith in your abilities:)

I'll be in touch...thanks again!!!
- Robert S.

Nate,
Thank you Nathan for representing me, you saved me alot of stress and my job. You are a lawyer I can call a friend, you represented me well in court for 2 cases that would of ruined me, Reckless Endangerment and a DUI. You were there for me, whenever I would call and ask a question you helped me out.When money got tight you worked with me also, thank you. Whenever I know I have a problem with the law your getting my call, thank you again.
- Mark

Mr. Webb fights for your rights through every step of the criminal process, even through a juried trial. Prosecutors are aware of the numerous motions we file on every case and know that we challenge every aspect of your arrest!

Nathan L. Webb offers aggressive, determined, and experienced representation.
Call today for a free consultation!

*These cases may be different from yours and the results do not imply that your case will necessarily result in a similar outcome.

**Deferred Prosecutions and Deferred Sentences result in dismissal if client fulfills conditions. No attorney can promise guaranteed results. RPC 7.1

Contact

WEBB LAW FIRM

Call today for Aggressive and Vigilant Criminal Defense | Sitemap